What is your preferred BibTeX database manager and why?

groups
#1

Hi I am looking to use BibTeX again after a long time of simply copying and pasting entries individually into my papers. Previously I have used: JabRef, Pybliographer, and BibDesk. But I know there is a lot of new software out e.g. papers and zotero etc.

So my question is what is your preferred BibTex database manager and why ? That is how does it compare to the other software you have used.

0 Likes

(kaktux) #2

you might want to ask this in a “normal” forum - latex community, reddit or something like that. Answers here might be biased :wink:

For my part: i have used jabref some time ago for university - but then switched to zotero.
As i really dislike the way zotero handles sorting of attachments (meaning the actual pdfs for articles and so on) i am playing with jabref again. So far probably the one thing keeping me for switching complety is the not yet ready jabfox version for linux. As it is my normal way to find new articles i really like the option to add it while i use my browser to search for new ones anyway.

0 Likes

(Rainhard Findling) #3

Hi!
I’ve tried many alternatives over the years, but in the end I always preferred JabRef (I had multiple “tries” so to say). The reasons are simple:

a) Built around bibtex/biblatex: JabRef is pretty much built around bibtex/biblatex database files. For all the alternatives I always had the feeling that those are cumbersome, because those were not built around bibtex/biblatex database files, but the functionality was just provided additionally. In my opinion, in the details that shows very much. In JabRef it’s e.g. easy do directly modify the underlying bibtex/biblatex code, and that code is also pretty much directly translated to/shown in the UI. There is nothing “in between” the code and what you see in the UI.

b) Groups: I heavily rely on grouping of entries (have >1000 entries in my files…). JabRef still seems superior to all the other options here for multiple reasons.

c) Unusual features: I guess I also rely on some more specialized features in bibtex/biblatex, like non-standard fields/tags, automatic filtering by those and/or attributes of entries, cleaning, conversion, etc. I always got into trouble with those additional things in alternatives to JabRef, which JabRef can handle them pretty much without any troubles.

0 Likes