# Jabref Comparison - Sächsiche Landesbibliothek - Juli 2018
**URL:** https://discourse.jabref.org/t/jabref-comparison-sachsiche-landesbibliothek-juli-2018/1746
**Category:** Help
**Created:** [September 18, 2019, 8:36am UTC](https://discourse.jabref.org/t/jabref-comparison-sachsiche-landesbibliothek-juli-2018/1746 "2019-09-18T08:36:19Z")
**Posts on this page:** 4
**Page:** 1
### Author:  [@kaktux](https://discourse.jabref.org/u/kaktux)
#### Post date: [September 18, 2019, 8:36am UTC](https://discourse.jabref.org/t/jabref-comparison-sachsiche-landesbibliothek-juli-2018/1746/1 "2019-09-18T08:36:19Z")
Hi there,
not my personal feedback - but i guess maybe your also interested in it:
just in case you haven’t seen it - Jabref in a comparison by the Sächsiche Landesbibliothek from Juli 2018 with Pro and Cons:
> **[Literarturverwaltungsprogramme\_im\_%C3%9Cberblick.pdf](https://www.slub-dresden.de/fileadmin/groups/slubsite/Service/PDF_Service/Literarturverwaltungsprogramme_im_%C3%9Cberblick.pdf)**
>
> 502.04 KB
Actually the mentioned cons are the one thing i will give a try if i got the time to play around with jabref some more.
---
### Author:  [@Siedlerchr](https://discourse.jabref.org/u/Siedlerchr)
#### Post date: [September 18, 2019, 8:46am UTC](https://discourse.jabref.org/t/jabref-comparison-sachsiche-landesbibliothek-juli-2018/1746/2 "2019-09-18T08:46:52Z")
Thanks for the feedback and regarding the cons with SharedDatabase:
There has been some improvement over the time and we also have an issue/PR which was a proof of concept for the connection with sharelatex/overleaf. [https://github.com/JabRef/jabref/pull/2866](https://github.com/JabRef/jabref/pull/2866)
If you find other papers/articles not mentioned in our wiki, please drop us a line:
> **[JabRef/jabref](https://github.com/JabRef/jabref/wiki/JabRef-in-the-Media)**
>
> Graphical Java application for managing BibTeX and biblatex (.bib) databases - JabRef/jabref
Regards
---
### Author:  [@kaktux](https://discourse.jabref.org/u/kaktux)
#### Post date: [September 18, 2019, 11:36am UTC](https://discourse.jabref.org/t/jabref-comparison-sachsiche-landesbibliothek-juli-2018/1746/3 "2019-09-18T11:36:03Z")
Not saying that integreation with collabotative tools hurts- but actually i think they do not mean “working together on a text” by that - but what is mentioned in the cooperation lines.
Sharing library datasets with others, and working/editing together using the same the literature manager.
As my main focus for jabref ist the literature managment and not writing texts using it - this is what i want to establish at some point also.
---
### Author:  [@Siedlerchr](https://discourse.jabref.org/u/Siedlerchr)
#### Post date: [September 19, 2019, 9:57am UTC](https://discourse.jabref.org/t/jabref-comparison-sachsiche-landesbibliothek-juli-2018/1746/4 "2019-09-19T09:57:09Z")
> Sharing library datasets with others, and working/editing together using the same the literature manager.
This is exactly what is already possible using the SharedSQL Database. [Page Redirection](http://help.jabref.org/en/SQLDatabase)
The idea of the sharelatex/overleaf integration was/is simliar. Only syncing of the bib files’s contents. Not collaboratively editing text.