Arxiv considered predatory?

[duboism (Mathieu Dubois)]

I recently run an integrity check against my (new) bibliographic database and I have been quite puzzled by the fact that arXiv is considered a predatory journal.

This is even weirder considering the fact that there is a dialog to import entries from arXiv.

Is there a way to tune the list of predatory journals?

To give you a bit of context, I work in a physics lab now and they massively use arXiv. I understand that articles there are not (yet) peer-reviewed but considering this predatory will be frowned upon. So maybe arXiv should be in the list of predatory journals at all.

Thanks in advance,
Mathieu

P.S.: I haven’t used JabRef much those last years and I am very pleased by it’s evolution.

[koppor (Oliver Kopp)]

Ideas to deal with are discussed at Double-check the bibliography for predatory publishers and journals - #7 by koppor

[duboism (Mathieu Dubois)]

OK, we will continue the discussion there.